OPEN LETTER TO CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
Sex
Workers Anonymous (Formerly Prostitutes Anonymous
www.swanfellowship.webs.com
www.leavingtheliferadio.com
www.sexworkersanonymous.com
(702)
468-4529 Telephone
November 10, 2015
Dear Assembly Committee on Public Safety:
If I had known about the meeting on human trafficking
held on October 20, 2015, I want you to know I would have attended.
But I was not invited because I'm assuming people in this field who
are aware of who I am also in respect to this field probably think I
am still living in Nevada where I've been since 1996. However,
because of calls I've been receiving from the members of Sex Workers
Anonymous, the 12 step program I founded in 1987 about what they've
been seeing happening in California, at their request and urging,
I've relocated back home to Los Angeles where our program, and the
modern day sex trafficking movement itself, was launched. Basically
the members have been wanting me back here to speak and appear for
them on some of these issues in ways they can't without “violating
their anonymity”. So here I am.
For those of you who have no idea who I am, or why I'm
writing you about this, please allow me to familiarize you. Then
you'll understand why I'm asking to please be invited to any future
events, workshops, panels, etc., being held on the subject of
prostitution, sex work, and/or sex trafficking, to represent myself
as a survivor who has been in recovery since 1985 continuously, as
well as the members of our “anonymous” program.
BACKGROUND
& HISTORY
To put things into context, if you go back to the
1980's, it was a time when America didn't even believe sex
trafficking was even real nor existed any longer – thinking it had
gone the way of “white slavery” and the “Barbary Coast”. The
sex industry, and the sexual revolution were very connected at this
time – being celebrated in major and popular media even. The
“Happy Hooker was a book by a famous hooker on the NY Best Seller
list, the “Best Little Whorehouse in Texas” was a film starring
Dolly Parton which was then even turned into a Broadway musical.
To show how the world viewed the idea of sex trafficking
back in the early 80's - Linda Lovelace, the largest porn star of the
time, released her book “Ordeal” in 1980. This confession
revealed she had been sex trafficked during the filming of “Deep
Throat”. This was the first adult film to go from a back alley
super 8 theater to a mainstream theater. The American public
completely refused to believe her. The porn industry discounted her
story entirely claiming it was “professional jealousy” now her
manager (who she claimed was her pimp) had gone on to instead manage
Marilyn Chambers.
Such was the climate I was in while being surrounded by
many different forms of sex trafficking. I say that because there
are many different types of trafficking. Some however require
extracting the victim from the situation and putting them into a
highly secure “safe house” where the pimp can't retrieve them.
Some will show up at the shelter, house, or location of the victim
heavily armed. AK47's were popular in the 80's with some of these
pimps and there literally were no options for them to escape.
Because there were other problems raging in Los Angeles
in the 1980's. First, we had a record number of serial killers
targeting prostitutes. Everyone from the Grim Reaper, to the Green
River Killer and the Hillside Strangler just to name three. Second,
HIV/AIDS was spreading like wildfire without anyone really quite
knowing the method of transmission. So there was a lot of fear then
of contracting the virus. Third, we had Iran Contra going on then
meaning southern California was being flooded with cocaine while the
gangs were being blamed. The crack epidemic was causing women to be
standing 10 deep in red light districts to the point where they'd be
blocking traffic. The police were having weekly “sweeps” where
they would be taking buses out to these zones and just packing them
full of prostitutes who'd then be on the streets again three hours
later. Fourth, drug treatment centers and shelters were refusing to
admit prostitutes for fear of either their pimps coming to retrieve
them to put them back “to work” or fear of contracting the virus.
Even guards in the jails were walking off the job in fear of going
anywhere near a prostitute and catching HIV/AIDS.
All of this was causing the budget to explode as a
record number of prostitutes were being incarcerated. No existing
programs, counselors, churches, etc., seemed to have any impact on
the issue – the minute the prostitutes were released they were
being re-arrested just hours later. Pimps were actually waiting at
the “bottom of the hill” at Sybil Brand for the prostitutes to be
released. If I called the police to help out with a trafficking
situation – the police's response was to laugh and hang up the
phone. As for the mental health community – when I'd try to speak
about what I was witnessing they would literally start to lock me up
for “observation” on the grounds I “must be hallucinating”
because “things like that just don't happen in today's world”.
So where do you turn when no one even believes something
is real? Worst yet when the outside world is viewing these women as
either “criminals” or “deviants” “junkies”, “crackheads”
or just plain worthless. Mothers of African American women being
murdered and dumped like trash at dumpsters even took to the streets
to protest how LAPD was doing nothing to investigate these womens'
murders – and still nothing was being done nor changed. We were
being hunted and we were disposable.
The first adult “safe house” was a warehouse I
rented next to the Van Nuys police station I installed with iron
bars, CCTV surveillance, gates, and even armed security. A pimp
angry he couldn't retrieve his victim from the warehouse called in an
“anonymous tip” to the police in 1984 that my warehouse was a
“brothel” setting off my arrest you can read about at
www.hightechmadam.com
The charges were dismissed as this was clearly not a brothel once
clearly examined, and the woman was questioned. In fact, she
testified against this pimp and put him and three other drug dealers
behind bars.
Once the dust settled, I installed the first national
800 hotline for adults who needed help to leave any part of the sex
industry for any reason. Clearly I didn't want to repeat what
happened at the warehouse – but I wanted to still do what I could
to provide help to adults (Children of the Night was taking in those
under 18 years of age into their residential program and she set up a
hotline for teens to call who were prostitutes because even they were
being refused at other shelters and programs which existed back then
for “runaways”). We offered help to anyone – male, female or
transgender – any age – any religion or lack of religion – from
any part of sex work whether it be stripping, porn, prostitution,
etc., and whether trafficked or not. If someone wanted help to
exit the sex industry for any reason – we couldn't turn anyone away
because literally NOTHING ELSE EXISTED. There
were no options.
I had met Edwin Meese because of his work on the “Meese
Report” studying the harmful effects of pornography at the time.
When Linda Lovelace had released her book – she partnered with
Edwin, and others, to campaign to ban pornography. Her premise was
if there wasn't a demand for her “services” then she wouldn't
been trafficked. This opened up our dialogue while he was the
Attorney General for California. He also was a witness to what was
going on with respect to Iran Contra and the sex trafficking going on
“hand in hand” with drug trafficking rhat was flooding the
country in the 1980's. I asked him what could be done to stop the
arrest of these victims who were being three times penalized –
first by being trafficked, second by being refused assistance by the
police, social services, drug treatment, etc., because of being
viewed as a criminal, and then third by being arrested and jailed as
a criminal for doing what they were being forced to do against their
will in the first place.
He told me it could be 100 years before we'd ever see
the laws change significantly enough to even recognize sex
trafficking as real, let alone change enough to stop arresting male
and female prostitutes who were not criminals. Up until then we
could set up “alternative to sentencing” by creating a 12 step
program and offering it under the same umbrella as AA and NA had been
doing for the addict and alcoholic who were also finding themselves
in court because of needing help rather than incarceration.
Hence Prostitutes Anonymous AND the modern day sex
trafficking movement demanding this issue be recognized, along with
demanding this country create systems to address this problem, was
born. We renamed ourselves to Sex Workers Anonymous in 1995 because
of the birth of the internet and the fact one could be “trafficked”
without having physical contact with the client. We did this after a
case we got involved in with a webcam operation in Russia. The
victims had been literally locked in a room for a year, drugged, and
kept in that room with their microphones off and then marketed.
Recognizing these women were victims without being prostitutes, and
because adult filters kept blocking the word “prostitute” meaning
people needing help couldn't find us – we changed our name.
The first alternative sentencing meetings were set up in
Los Angeles in 1987 for transgenders at first because of an
overcrowding situation at the mens' jail. Back then they were
housing them in the day room because of a lack of proper beds. Then
came pregnant and HIV positive women, and so on. The program was so
successful we were asked to come help set up the Program for Female
Offenders in Allentown, Pennsylvania in 1989. Then to set up SPACE
in Vancouver, Canada in 1991. In 1994, alternative sentencing was
set up through Second Chance in Ohio, and on until we were a part of
Project Rose in Arizona and Division 17 in Chicago.
Federal recognition of sex trafficking being “real”
and happening in modern day times was achieved with the passing of
the Trafficking Act in 2000. If not for 13 years of our survivors
going on TV telling their stories to convince America this was in
fact true, current, and happening on US soil to US citizens – then
it's doubtful it would have come to pass otherwise. We suffered
significant sacrifices and losses in order to stand up publicly at a
time when we were viewed as “criminals”, “disease carriers”,
“junkie's”, “whores”, etc. in order to make these public
appearances to accomplish this awareness raising. There were no
awards back then while we were changing minds and hearts – only a
lot of pink slips and eviction notices on my door when I'd come home
from a TV show taping for many years.
Our alternative sentencing offering for Los Angeles and
San Diego county ended in 1994 after the Sherman Oaks earthquake. I
relocated back to Nebraska and while our meetings continued in
southern California – none of our members were willing to break
their “anonymity” to anyone at the local probation department,
prosecutors' office, sheriff, etc. to maintain a liaison
communication. As a matter of fact, they still aren't. Our members
report to us they're still suffering a lot of job limitations and
social stigmatization. Look at what happened when the truth leaked
out about Suzy Favor Hamilton's work as a Vegas escort as just one
example of the damage the truth about our lives causes (no she's not
a member so I'm not violating a confidence here) when people find
out.
Which is my biggest problem right now with offering you
access to talk to some of our members today as well as why the
members are prompting me to speak to you on their behalf. Look at
Suzy's life for an example as to why – when the news came out she
was an escort she lost millions in contracts and sponsorships and
almost lost her marriage and custody of her child. So people have
grounds to be concerned about guarding their privacy. Also,
technology has changed things. Back in the 80's and early 90's we
could go on national TV shows like 60 Minutes, 20/20, Good Morning
America, Donahue, etc. and be seen across America. But then once the
show as over – our faces were then taken off the air where they
were forgotten a few days later.
So our members didn't mind speaking their stories on
major media back then to help raise awareness because we were hoping
to get the federal recognition. Again, keep in mind there were no
federal grants back then to be achieved as we hadn't achieved federal
recognition even until the year 2000 so it certainly wasn't like we
got any money for these appearances. If anything, in order to be
“believed” when we'd speak about sex trafficking – we would
refuse donations, as well as book and movie offers.
TIMES
HAVE CHANGED
Things are different now for two major reasons – the
first being the nature of media. Now if someone goes onto TV –
their face will be spread from one end of the world to the other and
it will probably never come off the internet. Meaning one of us
could be going on a job interview ten years from now and have a clip
about our past suddenly popping up to greet us. This kind of thing
makes one extremely reluctant to do any type of public appearance
that's going to be recorded, and also then placed on the internet for
posterity. Especially when we have no financial stake in the issue –
no federal grants we're applying for, no fund raisers we're
organizing, no office we're running for, etc. Our members aren't
just “new” to recovery either – they have careers, companies,
children, etc. In other words, a lot to lose should they reach out
in a public arena in an identifiable manner to speak.
The second is something that started happening to our
members starting with the passing of the TVRA of 2003. This change
in the trafficking law not only allowed for federal money to now be
obtained to work with this community, but further only on the
condition one NOT view this issue as one of an “industry” where
trafficking exists, but instead as a human rights violation. When
then President Bush weighed in restricting federal funds to only
faith based programs who previously had no track record of success
working with our community, or even really interest, this brought
onto the field a bunch of “faith based groups” who basically
looked down upon everyone who said that one could be in the sex
industry “voluntarily” or as a vocation in any way. Literally
the only way these could even “stomach” working with us was to
essentially “cherry pick” the heterosexual females of child
bearing age who were willing to identify by the label of “victim”
in exchange for financial resources and services we as a 12 step
program couldn't, and wouldn't offer them. I say that because we
don't believe in putting our members into year long programs being
kept like children when the goal is financial self-responsibility.
For the first time, money was an issue now in this work.
Meaning in 2003 our 12 step program had a meeting in every major
city of the USA who was working in partnership with the local police,
courts, social services, shelters, drug programs, mental health
departments, etc. because we had been working with this community
effectively, for free, and frankly since day one. Providing a form
of “case management” in the process at no cost to anyone also
making everyone else's job easier. Meaning whatever might have been
lacking in each town for that recovering prostitute/survivor – our
program was able to pick up that slack. Only after the TVRA of 2003
passed – suddenly we were handed a “pink slip” if you will at
every Salvation Army and Catholic Charity shelter where we had been
holding meetings. Why there? Because back then no facility would
donate us meeting space. Since we didn't charge anyone anything, and
received no outside funding, we couldn't afford rent.
Suddenly all of our chapters were “homeless” and
sent into chaos. Grant applications started going out from local
churches looking for funds to now hire people to do professionally
the very services which we had been doing for years for free as
volunteers. Why would anyone pay for something they can get for
free? So our members were further shunned, fired, shut out, ignored,
even in some cases banned from the property so they couldn't even
speak to their own sponsees anymore. Then the grant applications and
fund raisers were held to “fill the need” which had just been
artificially created.
Because there was no monetary judgment to win – we
couldn't find a lawyer to help us overturn this situation. We did
however get the ACLU involved which led to the winning of the ACLU v.
Catholic Bishops lawsuit in 2009, and further a Supreme Court
decision in 2012. What these meant in plain English was that one
could no longer shut us out of working with the very community that
was our membership in a field which we had created because of other
people with a financial, religious, and ideological agenda who
frankly outnumber us greatly. I'm only telling you this to explain
how we went from being a group with a chapter in every major city
nationwide in 2003 – to now being virtually invisible to the eye of
outsiders to our program.
Because these “faith based groups” had lost on legal
grounds the right to block us from even simple access to those
seeking recovery from the sex industry for any reason, and feeling
millions of dollars in grants and donations being threatened now they
couldn't legally shut us away from survivors who wanted to attend our
meetings – what was left without a legal ability to shut us out of
this field, and away from survivors was when the “witch hunts”
began as I call them. Starting about 2013, after the Supreme Court
win in 2012, we found we had to shut down all online groups, forums,
chat rooms, etc. We had to tell all SWA members to remove any
identification with our program off their social media.
To give you just one example of how bad it got – in
Phoenix where Project Rose was operating, we had a member of SWA just
simply start to set up a meeting. That was it – she found a
meeting spot and started to distribute flyers and invite potential
members to attend. The next thing she knows she's being stalked, her
home broken into, gasoline poured on her house, and she's even having
someone break into her car only stealing her flyers for the meeting.
This was happening in every city where a SWA meeting was being set
up. The secretaries were receiving threatening phone calls, they
were being smeared online, etc. It reached a point where we had to
completely restructure our entire program in order to not only
maintain our members' anonymity – but to also protect their basic
security and physical safety. This extended to identified members of
SWA also being fired from their jobs even if working in the field and
known they were members of SWA.
What this means is that our members right now are
EXTREMELY reluctant to appear anywhere on camera such as a city
council meeting or a legislature hearing, and especially reluctant to
have any interactions which might violate their anonymity such as
even speaking at public panels on the subject of sex trafficking. I
however am already considered a “public figure”. I provided the
world with copies of my arrest in 1984 to prove that I had set up a
warehouse in 1984 for victims which was mistaken as a brothel to
establish sex trafficking was in fact real in the modern world. I
did that so I wouldn't wind up with accusations discrediting me like
we saw with Samoly Mam, Chong Kim or even Rachel Moran. So in a
sense I've already given up my “anonymity” in order to represent
the voices of our members as best as I possibly can by writing
letters like this one today for you.
THE
VOICES WE REPRESENT
I represent an extensive range of voices. There are
some interviews with members up at www.leavingtheliferadio.com
Also, I frankly don't know any other program working with adults
that has the length of time in this field (I've been working with men
and women coming out of the sex industry since 1984 officially), the
geographic range we have (we have chapters across the USA, into
Canada, and also in five other countries right now. Our Russian
chapter has six meetings a week.) Our members are coming from both
the legal and illegal sides of the sex industry being we have members
coming out of the Nevada, UK, and Australian, legal brothels as well
as illegal brothels within the USA. The gender of our members is
male, female and trans, the religious base covers everything from
Christianity, to Judaism, Buddhism and of course our atheist members.
The age of our members ranges from teenagers on up to our oldest
board members is 83 years of age. Our members are coming from not
just prostitution, stripping, porn, and webcam studios – but they
include strip club owners, porn producers, madams, ex-pimps, massage
parlor madams who came to us with her 40 “employees” one night
after the death of her daughter. This horrible event prompted he to
ask to help the women working for her to get placed in jobs outside
of the parlor once she was closing down the shop.
I'm especially proud of a man who owned two strip clubs
where rampant trafficking was going on within them. He couldn't
stand the guilt any longer and one day asked to come help him go and
padlock the doors and hang the “for sale” sign. Considering as
you know he just lost almost all the value of the business by
shutting it down to sell it – I admire what he did that day very
much. Then when the women, and their pimps, showed up to “work”
he introduced them to SWA and offered every single one of the dancers
who had been working for him a way to leave their pimp, and the sex
industry, right there on the spot. He bought a lot of plane tickets
that night for women to go back home. Which is why you can see that
we don't limit our view to that of the issue being only about
prostitution, nor only about sex trafficking.
OUR
DIFFERENCES IS OUR STRENGTH
To give you a comparison of why our view might be a
little different than others and be a good thing – Polaris was
opened in 2002. We opened in 1987. The hard work had been done by
then – including the achievement of federal recognition. Polaris
wasn't fighting rooms full of people accusing them of “making up
stories to get on TV” when they opened their hotline. A hotline
which has taken about 100,000 calls to date according to their
reports. In going over our phone records – I've personally
answered over 500,000 calls to the hotline. When Polaris recommends
“yoga for survivors” based on a study they read – they haven't
been working on the recovery of survivors “one on one” over a
thirty year period of time, going to their homes for Christmas
dinner, attending their weddings, planning their college graduation
parties, or baking them a cake for their anniversary party
celebrating 29 years of “time” free from all forms of commercial
sexual behavior – forced or not – while we have.
Issues are going to appear different to the “rookie”
vs. the “old dog” which is why police departments have been
pairing older cops with those right out of the academy to train them
properly ever since I can remember. So too is the issue of
prostitution and sex trafficking. A quick story to illustrate –
last night our hotline got a call from a woman saying she was “being
trafficked and could not quit until she had a place to stay to get
away from her pimp”. She was requesting to be placed in a shelter.
Many programs would have done just that. Now I asked her if she
was physically free from danger and she confirmed she was in no
danger at all from the man who now is becoming her “boyfriend”
instead of her “pimp”. I then ask her how many times she's got
herself placed in someone's home, or a shelter, or a program, in
order to “leave this pimp” before she herself picked up the phone
and voluntarily returned back to what appears to be this man's
control over her. She replied four times now she's left, moved in
with someone, gotten a job, and then missing him, or the sex industry
– returned by choice.
Instead of directing her to a shelter, I paired her with
a “sponsor”, gave her a meeting schedule, and a copy of our
“Recovery Guide”. Upon which she admitted she was “addicted”
to the pimp, and this is what she really did need to address in order
to leave – not just be put into another shelter. I'm sure she's
going to be fine as we have a very high success rate with our members
with respect to getting them out of the industry entirely, in
recovery from other addictions and disorders, and not only not
returning to the sex industry within the two year mark that over 98
percent do return according to one study I read in the 1980's – but
we help them not suffer from what we've dubbed as “post-prostitution
syndrome”.
If you're familiar with the concept of a dry drunk –
then you'll know often victims who have had a pimp exploiting and
controlling them that once removed from said pimp will find someone
who exerts the same controlling and exploitative influence. Just
substituting one pimp for another. You'll see many of these leave
prostitution – only to then become controlled by maybe a church
pastor who exploits them for money. In fact, our first big “rescue”
case involved the “Children of God” cult where he was teaching
the women how to do “flirty fishing” (exploiting donors for money
using sex), and then putting their children into child porn he'd then
sell. After asking for housing for 10 families on a Geraldo show to
get away from this pastor – he fled the country in 1987 and changed
the name of his cult. Meaning sometimes emergency housing is
necessary for trafficking victims. I speak about this case to
explain why we don't just look for trafficking victims on a street
corner – but sometimes in police stations and even churches.
I go into the history of the movement, and our program
more in our book “Anatomy of a Movement” due out this December,
and our “Recovery Guide” which is available now which explains
more about how our program works, some of the issues we are working
with, and how we do work with them. I'm just trying here in this
letter to give you an idea about the wealth of experience and
knowledge I'd like you to know about, and to be able to draw upon as
needed, now that I'm back here residing in Los Angeles again.
Honestly, we haven't bothered to reach out to offices, and officials,
such as yours really before now unless we had direct business because
as a 12 step program we are volunteers first of all. Meaning we
spend our time only working with our members as a general rule. We
just don't have the kind of time involved to be running around doing
walk-athons, fund raisers, panels, luncheons, picnics. I mean it's
getting to be much when a few weeks ago we were trying to organize a
rescue of two women in Miami and literally every single trafficking
group we called was not answering our call to help these women
because of being at some fund raiser. For many groups – that's
all they do.
CHANGE
IS THE ONE CONSTANT
We've stuck to basically just our own members until we
started seeing our members being sought out, identified, targeted,
stalked, smeared, bullied, etc. by people with financial, political
and religious agendas. Then it reached the point where it impacted
our operations, our growth, and our safety.
Things changed for us recently to where we're now
finding ourselves unable to even do what we do because of certain
types of interference, targeting, and harassment that's even
difficult to describe clearly that's impacting us on many levels.
The only solution for which we can see for some of this is that we do
need to build a relationship between our program and others within
the trafficking field, the legislature, law enforcement, and the
political arena. In other words, non-members.
This is because of an increasing amount of the numbers
of traffickers we're seeing actually entering the field. Much like
how pedophiles will seek out employment or activities where they get
access to children. In order to protect themselves, traffickers are
now positioning themselves in very interesting ways. We know of more
than one residential program for example that's a front for a
trafficking operation. Now I ask you – who do we go to about this
when they are on the trafficking task force?
I'm now even seeing them affect the laws concerning
these issues. Does anyone remember when Pablo Escobar actually voted
for Mexico not to extradite drug traffickers – and then built his
own jail? Well I feel like I'm watching this happen here with
respect to sex trafficking. For example, we're even seeing convicted
pimps now testifying at your committee who is now “retired” but
who is engaged in active legitimization trying to get prostitution
legalized so that she can “open up shop” without getting
re-arrested again. Now if you feel someone like that should be
advising you on the issue of prostitution and trafficking – that's
understandable. But then you would also understand why we then feel
that maybe we should be included to provide some “counter-balance”
to that influence. Especially when associates of this convicted
pimp are some of the exact people who are threatening myself and our
members, and affecting the very operation of our hot line and
program. Also, just as some people with an agenda created the fake
“Samoly Mam” who was not a true trafficking victim – they're
doing the same thing with fake sex workers also misleading people
about the sex industry in the same vein.
So
for this reason, and many others too long to go into in this already
long letter, I'm writing you to ask that you please notify me of any
future hearings, meetings, panels, etc. on these subjects so that we
might attend, and hopefully even be involved.
We have to change the fact that this movement is
becoming “counter-productive” in some ways. Even Michael
Horowitz, the author of the Trafficking Act, has said in an interview
that movement has been “hijacked”. I liken it to this – this
country once had prohibition. Then heavy drinking was viewed as a
moral issue. Bill Wilson advanced the idea there was something at
work in the alcoholic they had no control over – the idea they
weren't “bad” but “sick”. A woman who got sober in AA, Marty
Mann, then founded the National Council on Alcoholism whose research
led to the medical research which then established alcoholism was in
fact a disease. Now courts take this into consideration and some are
offered treatment rather than jail. Now I ask you – what movement
about alcoholism would exclude Bill Wilson and Alcoholics Anonymous?
Well you had a meeting in October of 2015 involving prostitution and
trafficking, where some who attended are well aware we exist, yet we
were not invited to attend or even notified about said meeting.
THAT'S how a movement gets hijacked.
WHAT
NOW?
I first invite you to please check out the cases of
Margo Compton, Chris Butler, Liang Yaoshui, Kemp Schiffer, Operation
Dollhouse, the G Sting arrests, the Los Angeles and the Las Vegas
Police Chiefs and Sheriff's who have stepped down because of
corruption accusations, the NJ strip club owned by DEA agents, the
recent news of two Chicago cops who were trafficking a 14 year old
girl and the sentencing of three pimps who ran 9 massage parlors in
Wichita, Kansas in 2013 first.
After reviewing these cases in the news – I'll have an
easier time explaining to you that over the last 18 months I've been
reaching an increasingly deeper impasse with respect to sex
trafficking victims, as well as people who care about them, the state
of Internal Affairs and the impact technology is having on these
issues. For example – do you know how challenging it's become to
organize an “escape” of a victim when because of new technology
her trafficker can over hear every single word she's saying on the
phone? Further, the phone is tracking her movements? I say we
have a conflict when I see a panel by non-survivors advising people
in this field that the new technology of these phones can “aid
rescue” of victims – when right here on the front lines I'm
seeing it's trapping them.
Also, our hotline is receiving calls about alleged cases
of sex trafficking I'm trying to do the two things I normally do in
these cases (1) connect them to services needed and (2) go to the
authorities to address the trafficking that's active and ongoing to
get it shut down. That's what all these millions of dollars are
being put out there is for – to be able to create a system where
victims can receive assistance.
Twelve step groups can only do so much. Sometimes
outside programs and services need to be brought in. If for example
an addict is in an NA meeting and he's been using a lot of drugs over
a short period of time and he goes into a seizure – guess what?
I'm going to call an ambulance for that addict. I'm not going to
tell him to “go to meeting” when he's having a seizure. Meaning
sometimes I have situations where we need outside assistance. Now
since I have been in Los Angeles – I have tried to get assistance
with cases being reported to me of sex trafficking from local law
enforcement, the trafficking task forces, the groups supposedly there
to help – and I'm not receiving ANY RESPONSE AT ALL. I am
literally contacting the police, the task forces, the NGO'S – and
there's something very wrong here when I can't even get so much as a
return phone call let alone assistance. This is not personal either
as I've asked the victims directly to ask for assistance/response and
THEY are not being responded to in any way. Not one case, not one
call – but over a period of TWO YEARS NOW.
I had a bitter conflict with one of our members in
Chicago, Brenda Myers-Powell, when she took a job working with the
Chicago police helping prostitutes. Why? Because our view of
trafficking is that it's always, and is increasing, it's involvement
with people within law enforcement and authorities. Meaning for
victims to feel safe enough to come forward for help – they have to
know we are NOT connected to law enforcement in any significant way.
By taking a job with them – Brenda became “one of them”. I
felt this would then block many victims from coming forward to her
for help. Now thank God the FBI was able to uncover those two agents
who were trafficking that 14 year old girl – because before the FBI
had that operation going we've had to rely on helping girls like that
with our “reputation on the streets” as “not being connected
with law enforcement”. So I feel that had Brenda not taken that
job – the girl quite possibly might have come forward to our
hotline sooner.
I bring this up to explain why I try and keep a “public”
distance from law enforcement in the media. I don't want victims
think we're “too close” to law enforcement because I'm trying to
encourage all victims to come forward – even those afraid of the
cops. However, I'm now getting more and more reports about sex
trafficking involving the authorities beyond what the FBI uncovered
in Chicago and I'm trying to figure out where to go with this. I'm
getting absolutely no response from anyone in any type of Internal
Affairs offices either.
So you can see I have many reasons why I'm reaching out
to the people connected with the recent hearing and realizing I need
to establish some kind of connection/relationship. I'm therefore
asking you to please let me know of future events, and volunteering
to be involved and help in any way that I can. We do by the way
have some projects going that you might find useful and/or
interesting.
There's an outreach project, a teaching series, a
documentary/research film, our history project, and just all kinds of
interesting and useful things we have going on. Please let me know
more about what each of you are doing so that I can get up to speed
on work.
Thank your for your time in reading this letter. I look
forward to meeting and talking with each of you.
Sincerely,
Jody Williams
Comments
Post a Comment